PERCEPTION

logo ARTICLE 27

Cyclope

Monday 31 October 2005 Hervé MATHIEU

The tracker was developed to favor 3D interactions by:

  1. Tracking the user’s head for improving the stereo display,
  2. Tracking a wand for manipulating virtual 3D objects.

An innovative design

-  The tracker is a low cost and robust input device. It is based on standard components.
-  It implements state of art algorithms developed by the computer vision community.
-  It achieves accuracy to the millimeter at 30 frames per second. The latency is of 60 milliseconds.
-  This single camera technology has a number of advantages over alternative solutions such as: magnetic trackers (sensitive to noise) and a multiple cameras tracker with a narrow field of view.
-  No dedicated processing unit is required. The software runs on a standard PC (Linux or WINDOWS).
-  The tracker is compatible with active stereo display technology.

Tracker performance

-  Volume: 60 degrees (H) x 57 degrees (V) x 5 meters (D)
-  Accuracy: 1 mm, 0.2 degree at 1.5 meter
-  Frequency: 60 Hertz
-  Latency: 60 ms
-  Up to 4 targets simultaneously

The Tracker system elements

The Tracker system consists of the following components:

-  The Tracker itself (Camera + IR Flash)
-  Power supply (15 volts, 1.5 ampere)
-  Cables (Power supply, FireWire)
-  Rigid Bodies: different types of targets, built of spherical retro-reflecting markers, are available. The user may design its own targets for special applications.
-  Software package: tracker program, configuration file, example of a VRPN server, example of a VRPN client.

About competitors

We list the main system competitors and give some comparison.

-  Magnetic trackers (Polhemus Fast-Track, Ascension Technology Flock of Birds). They are disturbed by ferro-magnetic objects and other magnetic fields
-  Optical Tracker composed of cameras mounted on a rig (North Digital Polaris). They have a narrow field of view. They are more expensive.
-  Optical Tracker composed of non-fixed cameras (ART ArTrack). They have a narrow field of view. They do need an inter-camera registration procedure to be done. They are much more expensive.
-  Others trackers (Natural Point OptiTrack). The OptiTrack system is less accurate and the field of view is narrower.

See also: The Cyclope Home Page

Documents